Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 11:52

Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
See photos: Miguel Angel Jiménez wins the Principal Charity Classic - The Des Moines Register
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Some men love anal sex more than vaginal sex. Why?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Fans slam Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford's message to "cost sensitive" fans - Eurogamer